[coreboot] [PATCH 5/5] Be less noisy in ram_check in non-debug loglevels

ron minnich rminnich at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 07:40:56 CET 2008

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Corey Osgood <corey.osgood at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you're running it in production code to detect the ram size, do you
> really want to send an error message after you find the (expected) end of
> ram? In other words, do you want to have an error message show up on every
> boot displaying an error message about a ram failure, and the address of
> that failure, that an end user (familiar only with typical BIOSes) might
> believe to be a bad thing?

yes, a thing that is not an error should never look like an error ...


More information about the coreboot mailing list