[coreboot] [PATCH 4/6] Support for the Intel 945 northbridge

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 07.11.2008, at 19:09, "Myles Watson" <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>> Ok, trying to address the issues:
>
> Thanks.  It makes it more motivating to do future reviews.

Sorry I didn't reply earlier. Your input is much appreciated. Don't be  
demoticated by the delay. Stuff like this won't be lost.

>
>
>>> //Consistency with \r\n ...
>>>
>>>> +    printk_debug("ok\r\n");
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void i945_setup_egress_port(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    u32 reg32;
>>>> +    u32 timeout;
>>>> +
>>>>
>>> //and just \n
>>>
>> Which one is the right one to use these days?
>
> I think the consensus was just \n.  That's what v3 uses all the way  
> through.

In v3 we use the same printk all over the place, while in v2 we have a  
mess... I think print_debug wanted \r while printk_debug does the  
right thing and attaches it automatically. So I need to fix \r\n to.  
\n in a lot of places.

Thanks,
Stefan