[coreboot] [RFC] Null pointer trap?
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Fri Nov 7 17:24:01 CET 2008
On 07.11.2008 17:15, ron minnich wrote:
> we can't do this well until we start turning on paging.
True.
> If you want to argue that we
> should poison memory used by coreboot, I'm good with that.
>
Poisoning as a default-off option will be forthcoming as a patch.
Default off because it will interfere with Suspend-to-RAM. But for other
cases, it may provide valuable hints. For one, it does make stack size
detection a lot more reliable.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
More information about the coreboot
mailing list