[coreboot] r3356 - trunk/util/flashrom

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 28.05.2008 00:22, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> Author: stuge
>> Date: 2008-05-27 22:54:09 +0200 (Tue, 27 May 2008)
>> New Revision: 3356
>>
>> Modified:
>>    trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
>> Log:
>> flashrom: MX25L4005, S25FL016A, W39V040B, W39V080A, SST49LF008A tests.
>>
>> I have tested MX25L4005, S25FL016A and W39V080A myself.
>>
>> Thanks also to the following testers:
>> SST49LF008A Bernhard M. Wiedemann
>> W39V040B Dan Lenski
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>
>> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>
>>
>>
>> Modified: trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c	2008-05-27 20:07:47 UTC (rev 3355)
>> +++ trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c	2008-05-27 20:54:09 UTC (rev 3356)
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>>     
> ...
>   
>> -	{"SST",		"SST49LF008A",		SST_ID,		SST_49LF008A,		1024,	64 *
>> 1024,	TEST_UNTESTED,	probe_sst_fwhub,	erase_sst_fwhub,		write_sst_fwhub},
>> +	{"SST",		"SST49LF008A",		SST_ID,		SST_49LF008A,		1024,	64 *
>> 1024,	TEST_OK_PR,	probe_sst_fwhub,	erase_sst_fwhub,		write_sst_fwhub},
>>     
>
> Did you try compiling this TEST_OK_PR? :)
> Fixed in r3357
>   

Please revert and add a TEST_OK_PR definition. Only PR had been tested
for that chip.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel