[coreboot] [PATCH] Hardcode PCI devices in Intel southbridge early init code

[Corey Osgood]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Corey Osgood <corey.osgood at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:32 PM, <joe at smittys.pointclark.net> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de>:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:04:59PM -0400, joe at smittys.pointclark.netwrote:
> > >> Ack that. The RM4100 has a i82801DB ICH4 and I am using the i82801xx
> > >> code. The original i82801DB code never worked right, so can we at
> > >> least drop that one?
> > >
> > > We should only drop code where all boards in svn have been migrated to
> > > i82801xx (and tested!) to be on the safe side. I.e. if there's an
> > > ICH* southbridge which is no longer used by any board, drop it (but
> > only
> > > in that case). If this means we keep the old code around for the time
> > being,
> > > that's fine.
> > >
> > > But of course we should
> > >
> > >  - Make all _new_ boards work with i82801xx only (not the other ones)
> > >
> > >  - Only port the i82801xx to v3 (not the other ones)
> > >
> > >
> > Like I said the i82801DB has never work and no ther boards use it.......
> > Ok, so how do we drop i82801DB via svn? Do we need ACK, Sign-off, etc?
> >
> > Thanks - Joe
> >
>
> Use "svn rm", and yes, you'd need an ack that I'd be happy to provide.
> Make sure you abuild test it, just to make sure that there's no board we've
> forgotten about that's using it. If there is, I'm 90% sure it's the one with
> the i855 northbridge, and that's never worked either, so probably all of it
> could be dropped.
>
> -Corey
>

Yep, it's the digitallogic/adl855pc. I think it was Ron that said the 855
never worked, but that was a long time ago, and I can't be sure.  Perhaps we
should just leave it kicking around, and focus on not letting this happen to
v3.

-Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20080331/f56f4339/attachment.html>