[coreboot] SMM handling and resident coreboot

Joseph Smith joe at settoplinux.org
Tue Jul 29 04:10:40 CEST 2008

> The problem I see with this is that a hypervisor can have significant
> overhead.  (One has to task switch to the hypervisor to do IO.)  Also,
> I doubt everyone will agree on a single hypervisor implementation
> (kvm, vmware, virtualbox, xen, microsoft's vm, etc.).
My vote is for virtualbox, it is the sweetest one I have seen yet :-)

Joseph Smith

More information about the coreboot mailing list