[coreboot] SMM handling and resident coreboot
Joseph Smith
joe at settoplinux.org
Tue Jul 29 04:10:40 CEST 2008
> The problem I see with this is that a hypervisor can have significant
> overhead. (One has to task switch to the hypervisor to do IO.) Also,
> I doubt everyone will agree on a single hypervisor implementation
> (kvm, vmware, virtualbox, xen, microsoft's vm, etc.).
>
My vote is for virtualbox, it is the sweetest one I have seen yet :-)
--
Thanks,
Joseph Smith
Set-Top-Linux
www.settoplinux.org
More information about the coreboot
mailing list