[coreboot] Patch file for ld/fedora 8 more issues...

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

On 23.01.2008 02:24, joe at smittys.pointclark.net wrote:
> Quoting Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>:
>
>   
>> On 23.01.2008 01:41, joe at smittys.pointclark.net wrote:
>>     
>>> Arugh!!! When I tested the patch eveerything worked ok but now with
>>> the new svn version, when I try abuild it get this:
>>> ------------------------
>>>    Creating builddir...ok
>>>    Compiling image ..FAILED after 13s! Log excerpt:
>>> gcc -m32  -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o coreboot_ram -T
>>> /home/joe/coreboot-v2/src/config/coreboot_ram.ld coreboot_ram.o
>>> collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]
>>> make[1]: *** [coreboot_ram] Error 1
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory
>>> `/home/joe/coreboot-v2/util/abuild/coreboot-builds/via_epia/normal'
>>> make: *** [normal/coreboot.rom] Error 1
>>> ------------------------
>>>
>>> Here is my version info:
>>> $ ld -v
>>> GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.18-1 20070731
>>> $ gcc -v
>>> Using built-in specs.
>>> Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
>>> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
>>> --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
>>> --enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
>>> --disable-libunwind-exceptions
>>> --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada
>>> --enable-java-awt=gtk --disable-dssi --enable-plugin
>>> --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre
>>> --enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-java-maintainer-mode
>>> --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --with-cpu=generic
>>> --host=x86_64-redhat-linux
>>> Thread model: posix
>>> gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)
>>>
>>> What gives???
>>>
>>>       
>> That's the ld bug Marc hit as well. I think it is specific to one Fedora
>> version. Maybe it helps to open a bug in the Fedora bugzilla.
>> One of Marc's patches had a workaround for that segfault as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Carl-Daniel
>>
>>     
> It wouldn't be x86_64 related would it?
>   

No idea.

Marc?

Regards,
Carl-Daniel