[coreboot] [LinuxBIOS] Patch file for ld/fedora 8 issue as promised...
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Sat Jan 19 23:54:27 CET 2008
Hi Marc!
To commit your patch, I need a signoff from you because you created the
patch. Please see
http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines#Sign-off_Procedure for
details.
Thanks!
On 19.01.2008 23:15, joe at smittys.pointclark.net wrote:
> Quoting Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>:
>
>> To bring this issue to an end, I resolved all conflicts the patch had
>> against the current tree and regenerated it without the controversial
>> id.lds section.
>>
>> On 09.01.2008 16:13, Marc Karasek wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is the latest.
>>>
>>> It uses -ge instead of == or >. This will take care of any time that
>>> there are more than 1 build-id in the ld -help output.
>>>
>>> Myles Watson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like the idea of using grep. It seems much cleaner, and avoids
>>>> that issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Myles Watson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2008 8:15 AM, Marc Karasek <Marc.Karasek at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry to be picky, but it seems like this breaks if they mention
>>>>>> build-id more than once in the help in the future. I think >0 would
>>>>>> be better than ==1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that fixed, or if no one thinks that will ever happen:
>>>>>> Acked-by: Myles Watson <myles at pel.cs.byu.edu>
>>>>>>
>> If we used grep, the buildtarget snippet could probably be made a bit
>> smaller:
>> ld --help | grep -q build-id && EXTRA_LFLAGS+=" -Wl,--build-id=none"
>>
>>
>> Next try (does not (yet?) use grep):
>>
>> Marc, I could not find your Signed-off-by: in the thread. If that patch
>> is OK for you, please sign off on it.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net>
>>
>>
> Works fine for me.
>
> Acked-by: Joseph Smith <joe at smittys.pointclark.net>
>
Thanks for testing, Joe!
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
More information about the coreboot
mailing list