[coreboot] [LinuxBIOS] Patch file for ld/fedora 8 issue as promised...

Marc Karasek Marc.Karasek at Sun.COM
Mon Jan 14 16:19:55 CET 2008


After some more investigating I think I have found the core problem with 
the id.lds file. 

I think this is a bug in binutils.   if you look at the link below you 
will see an explanation.  I have checked and I am using 2.17.50 on my 
system. 
this could explain the problem I am seeing with linking.  It seems a 
check within ld is not working properly for sections that are at the top 
of an image/memory. (base+size = 0).  Looks like a fix has been put into 
binutils already.

My question is do we leave the patch in place or just make a note 
somewhere that if you see this problem :
1) Upgrade binutils (if possible)
or
2) Make changes to id.lds


http://www.nabble.com/binutils-2.18-and-U-Boot-td14266866.html


/*********************
Marc Karasek
MTS
Sun Microsystems
mailto:marc.karasek at sun.com
ph:770.360.6415
*********************/



Myles Watson wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:41 PM, Marc Karasek <Marc.Karasek at sun.com> wrote:
>   
>> So what is the general consensus ==1 or >0?
>>     
>
> I like the idea of using grep.  It seems much cleaner, and avoids that issue.
>
> The other sticking point for the patch the changes in
> src/arch/i386/lib/id.lds (See Ed's last message.)
>
> Myles
>
>   
>> Also,  I think I know how to commit back to the tree,  but do I need a
>> user account for this?
>>
>> /*********************
>> Marc Karasek
>> MTS
>> Sun Microsystems
>> mailto:marc.karasek at sun.com
>> ph:770.360.6415
>> *********************/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Myles Watson wrote:
>>     
>>> On Jan 7, 2008 8:15 AM, Marc Karasek <Marc.Karasek at sun.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> After looking at the script Myles sent, I immediately saw the problem.
>>>> I forgot that if  [ $build_id ] will always be true because it checks to
>>>> see if it is defined not the value of build_id.  My bad, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> I have made the changes and added an == 1 to the if statement.  Attached
>>>> is the new and I hope final patch file for this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> It works for me (it doesn't add the load option.)
>>>
>>> Sorry to be picky, but it seems like this breaks if they mention
>>> build-id more than once in the help in the future.  I think >0 would
>>> be better than ==1.
>>>
>>> With that fixed, or if no one thinks that will ever happen:
>>> Acked-by: Myles Watson <myles at pel.cs.byu.edu>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> /*********************
>>>> Marc Karasek
>>>> MTS
>>>> Sun Microsystems
>>>> mailto:marc.karasek at sun.com
>>>> ph:770.360.6415
>>>> *********************/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ed Swierk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On 1/4/08, Marc Karasek <Marc.Karasek at sun.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> I made a test script and ran it and it sets build_id = 1 properly.  I
>>>>>> have also included this script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> The problem is that on Planet Bourne, zero means true and nonzero means false.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Ed
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           




More information about the coreboot mailing list