[LinuxBIOS] Support for IEI Nova4899R [1]

[Luis Correia]

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Following this, i changed the irq_tables.c file to be like this:
>
> Did you fix the table's headers too, to read the correct
> number of entries, and the right checksum?  The table you
> derived yours from had only two devices entries, and your
> results are sort-of consistent with that.
>
Yes, see attached file.
>> Nonetheless, the kernel assumes some strange things, let's keep in  
>> mind that
>> the kernel i'm using is an old 2.4.20, which may or may not treat  
>> this IRQ
>> assignments correctly. Using pci=biosirq makes no change.
>
> A newer kernel might help for sure.
>
I tried to use a current Fedora or CentOS distro, but
both refused this processor. I don't have the stamina
to brew my own kernel right now.

>> These are the IRQ's the kernel assigns:
>>
>> USB    IRQ9
>> eth0   IRQ10
>> eth1   IRQ11
>> eth2   IRQ9
>
> Can you show us all kernel boot messages about IRQ routing?
> Or just *all* boot messages ;-)
>
>
> Segher
>
Your wish is my command :)

All boot messages and the current irq table are attached.


p.s. don't CC me, i'm on the list.


Luis Correia



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20061106.tar.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 3702 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20061106/0225b93e/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: irq_tables.tar.gz
Type: application/gzip
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20061106/0225b93e/attachment-0001.bin>