[LinuxBIOS] copy_secondary_start_to_1m_below() and non-smp
Richard Smith
smithbone at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 17:23:41 CET 2006
>
> Yh Lu, this is your patch that broke things, I assume you will fix?
>
I don't mind fixing it. (I already have for my tree) I just don't know
which fix is prefered. Either add a wrapper around the call or pull
the definition out and make it compile to a empty function like it
does when _RAMBASE is set to a large value.
--
Richard A. Smith
More information about the coreboot
mailing list