[LinuxBIOS] Compiling errors for flashrom
Christian Sühs
chris at suehsi.de
Thu Dec 15 22:22:23 CET 2005
>
>
> weird. gcc 3.3.5 from SUSE 9.3 and gcc 4.0.2 from SUSE 10 work fine. You
> should definitely avoid using gcc 2.96 when possible.
Unfortanetly, with gcc 2.96 I'm not able to compile the LB image itself :D
Furthermore, I work on a selfmade minimal distro, but I will try to
compile a working gcc version to compile both, flashtool and the image
without any warnings
Currently I'm wondering about the differences in gcc. For flashtool I
get warnings for comparisons between signed and unsigned only, without
the -Werror Flag and the gcc 3.3 version. Why isn't gcc backwards
compatible?
Now I have the tool compiled with gcc 2.96 and it works, but compiling
the image with gcc 3.3 results in the same warnings and a few warnings
more. It could be, that the image won't work :(
However, I will test the results the next days and stay tuned :D
>
>
regards chris
@Stefan
I think i can mail to in german, is it so ??
More information about the coreboot
mailing list