Q: Which is used the 855pm or the i855pm code?

Eric W. Biederman ebiederman at lnxi.com
Wed Oct 27 11:56:21 CEST 2004

"Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:

> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > 
> > I am walking through the code converting the sizeram() functions
> > and have run across a duplicate 855pm and the i855pm.
> my fault. Sorry, ignore 855pm. 
> > Is there a reason we have two of these?  If not can we just delete
> > src/northbridge/intel/855pm?
> yeah, delete it. 


> Thanks very much for looking this port. 
> It's worse than that. Early docs I had indicated it was the pm part but I 
> think it is the GM part, so that code is probably GM code by now. I have 
> not had time to go back and put that back together. 

Ok.  The GM and the PM appear to be strongly related so I don't think it
is likely to be a problem.  It is just a pain to start updating a port
so it works and then you come to realize the port never worked.


More information about the coreboot mailing list