Source code control
Adam Megacz
adam at megacz.com
Mon Jan 5 00:19:01 CET 2004
You really should check out darcs. I did an extensive arch/darcs
comparison, and the XWT project (xwt.org) is going with the latter.
Vastly simpler than either bk or arch but with all the same features.
- a
ebiederman at lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> This is just a heads up. I have been doing some investigation
> into distributed version control systems. arch looks like it
> usable and getting more usable.
>
> >From the design standpoint I don't see any big issues and
> it appears to be the equal of bk etc. I think I see some
> was to make it simpler and more powerful but that is not needed to
> make a good revision control system.
>
> I need to do a little more testing to see what arch is actually like
> to use. Before I seriously start advocating anything but I'm not
> expecting any weird issues to crop up. Except possibly for some
> issues running under cygwin, for the platform challenged.
>
> Once my evaluation is finished I plan on pushing the projects I work
> on in that direction. So this is something to think about.
>
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxbios mailing list
> Linuxbios at clustermatic.org
> http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
>
--
"If Darl McBride [the CEO of SCO, who claims the GPL 'destroys
intellectual property'] was in charge, he'd probably make marriage
unconstitutional too, since clearly it de-emphasizes the commercial
nature of normal human interaction, and probably is a major
impediment to the commercial growth of prostitution"
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the coreboot
mailing list