PCI-X Board or Chipset recommendataions

Richard A. Smith rsmith at bitworks.com
Thu Jan 9 11:43:00 CET 2003


On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 13:00:46 -0700 (MST), Ronald G. Minnich wrote:

> On 8 Jan 2003, Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> 
> > How LinuxBIOS friendly are the e7500/Xeons for LinuxBIOS?  Any NDA
> > issues like AMD MSRs or similar?
> 
> no nda issues whatsoever. Intel has been extremely helpful on this 
> chipset. In fact there was a glitch a few months ago and Intel did what 
> needed to be done to get it fixed.
> 

Wow. thats quite a different story that what I got.  Intel is so
inconsistent sometimes.  I tried to get the register documentation
for the 440MX (note MX not BX which I already have) and not only do
you have to be under the standard NDA you have to go get a under an
extra double-dog-secret NDA which my Intel rep said "is quite
difficult to get"  So we bailed on the 440MX and are going to respin
our BX version.

Any possibility you could put me in touch with your Intel contact? 
Perhaps he could shed some light on why the 440MX is so shrouded.

--
Richard A. Smith                         Bitworks, Inc.               
rsmith at bitworks.com               479.846.5777 x104                        
Sr. Design Engineer        http://www.bitworks.com   





More information about the coreboot mailing list