On Mon, June 22, 2015 10:07 am, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:04:13PM +0200, Paolo
On 22/06/2015 14:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Because it's a pain if I need to move code
between files with
licenses. MIT is GPL compatible but mixing
licenses at random is
not a good idea.
This is a non-problem. How often does it happen that code is moved
between files (as opposed to extracted to a new file)?
Besides, the rule you want is not enforceable because Fabrice Bellard
explicitly wanted TCG-related files to be BSD.
It's not a big deal, but it's preferable if possible.
Paulo do you have a problem switching to GPLv2+?
No, I really don't. If it's really preferable and brings advantage to the
project, then I see no problem at all.
Paulo Alcantara, C.E.S.A.R
Speaking for myself only.