On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:45:31AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 22/06/2015 10:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Given that support is known to be partial, would
it make sense
to keep it disabled by default for 2.4?
What is partial about it?
Ow, looks like I didn't send out the response to the patch itself.
In fact, considering that q35 behavior is
still experimental it makes no sense to even make it conditional.
I agree to this, though an option to disable seems useful for debugging,
so I'm glad that Paulo implemented it. It's probably not strictly
required to disable for old machine types, but why not.
discussed this on IRC and I was hoping to hear you reply "sorry, I was
wrong". Instead, I get this.
Michael, I'm seriously getting annoyed by this behavior. Stop scaring
Doing my best here, but I do think we need to be careful about merging
things at this stage to avoid delaying the release.
> This way in 2.5 we won't need to add more
flags to stay bug compatible.