On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 07:09:54PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 12/30/2015 02:31 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
The low-level measurement functions already handle
there is no need to check for the errors in the high level measurement
Signed-off-by: Kevin O'Connor <kevin(a)koconnor.net>
@@ -507,7 +478,12 @@ tpm_setup(void)
This looks like a for Xen where we will be missing too much. Cc'in Xu Quan
for this. I think Xen likely only wants to skip the TPM_Startup in
tpm_startup() but not the retrieval of the durations and timeouts and so on.
This part may need to move.
That makes sense, but note that the position of the check hasn't
changed in this series.
I wonder if the error from TPM_Startup on Xen could just be ignored as
is done for CONFIG_COREBOOT.