Le 01/11/2015 23:46, Mark Cave-Ayland a écrit :
On 25/10/15 15:48, Laurent Vivier wrote:
This series of patches allows to build openbios
powerpc64 host. It has been tested with the following targets:
ppc, sparc32, sparc64. It has also been tested on x86_64 host
with the same targets.
v2: remove patches 3/5 and 4/5 of the first series and replace it
with patch 4/4. We don't include the system includes using
full pathname but use '-iquote' intead of '-I'
A preliminary patch is needed for fcode-utils, as "toke" is
broken on big endian architecture:
diff -ru fcode-utils/toke/scanner.c fcode-utils-new/toke/scanner.c
--- fcode-utils/toke/scanner.c 2006-10-30 09:48:28.000000000 +0100
+++ fcode-utils-new/toke/scanner.c 2015-10-19 00:21:43.417373690 +0200
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@
void user_message( tic_param_t pfield )
- char delim = (char)pfield.deflt_elem ;
+ char delim = (char)pfield.fw_token ;
handle_user_message( delim, TRUE);
@@ -5295,7 +5295,7 @@
void process_remark( tic_param_t pfield )
- char until_char = (char)pfield.deflt_elem ;
+ char until_char = (char)pfield.fw_token ;
unsigned int start_lineno = lineno;
Laurent Vivier (4):
switch-arch: factorize code to compute architecture properties.
switch-arch: compute base arch and allow native compiler for 32bit
switch-arch: as for powerpc64, select sparc64 compiler to compile
bootstrap: don't include files from target/include as system includes.
Makefile.target | 2 +-
config/scripts/switch-arch | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
include/arch/ppc/types.h | 8 -----
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
I've done some tests here on both x86 and PPC
hardware and the basic
patchset works well here. The only issue I found is that git-am
complains about whitespace errors during application - if you could
resubmit the series with this fixed, that would be great.
Can I have more details, I've tried to "git-am" the patches I have
generated and I had no troubles (do you have some git hooks ?)
As for the toke fix, I don't know this code
particularly well but I can
at least confirm that when applied it still produces valid binaries.
Could you send a separate patch in "git style" explaining what bug this
patch fixes, and if it looks good then I'll apply it too.
Thanks a lot for this patchset. After re-applying on a fresh branch, the
whitespace errors were gone and everything still passed my local tests
so I've pushed the changes to SVN trunk.
This will definitely make testing OpenBIOS on PPC/KVM so much easier in