ebiederman(a)lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
Ronald G Minnich <rminnich(a)lanl.gov> writes:
> OK, looking around, it's about what I expected.
> However one thing we might be able to use: EFI is called from something
> called SAL. SAL is real low-level stuff you will never see the source to
> that does all the horrible stuff that Intel won't tell us how to do.
> You don't need EFI. You need something to link to SAL that replaces EFI. I
> think that's our hook.
So if intel won't cooperate we need to plan on reverse engineering SAL. Unless
IA64 dies soon it is probably a worthwhile investment.
Ron unless you have something better I'd suggest using one of the
upcoming dual Itanium/P4 chipsets as a starting point. Then you could
be certain the chipset worked before on x86 before trying to reverse
engineer the cpu initialization for the Itanium...
That isn't a very aggressive plan but unless we start moving in a
hurry it is probably a very workable one.
To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de
with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message