On Sunday, December 17, 2017, 12:06:51 PM EST, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

Hi!

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:22:29AM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 15/12/17 23:26, Jd Lyons wrote:
> >I’m having trouble CC ing the list, I know stupid of me.
> >
> >Any idea what the unnamed FCode in the detok is?
> >
> >Does detok just not understand it, or is it words or methods?
>
> From memory I believe it's an anonymous Forth word, i.e. one where the
> dictionary name is empty but it can still be called by its address.

That's right.  It's a token created with new-token instead of named-token
or external-token (b5, b6, ca respectively).  It has no name, so you cannot
call it by name, but it is perfectly valid FCode, you can access the created
word by token number like everything else.


Segher