On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber(a)web.de> wrote:
Am 28.11.2010 um 15:50 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Andreas Färber
Am 21.11.2010 um 13:33 schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Segher
>> Sounds to me like the real problem is with how ar is used, then?
>> Can you show the ar commands that fail?
> Oh I see now. ar doesn't store pathname.
> If you can require a new enough binutils (2.19 or newer), you could
> use "thin archives", which don't have this limitation, and have
> some more advantages. See the -T option to ar (ar rcsT bla.a ...)
> Another option is to have an archive file per directory.
The object files could be renamed before archiving, or GCC -o target
could be different from what simple %o: %.c substitution rule would
But googling for the project finds very few references, most of them
are OpenBIOS. This seems to be the source:
It's stale, but I found it here:
in the project hfsplusutils. Linux fs/hfsplus seems to be very
So I think renaming would be the easiest solution, in the unlikely
event that hfsplusutils project revives we can still pretty easily
The patch once again is line-wrapped  unfortunately. It would be nice
you could push such patches to your http://repo.or.cz/w/openbios.git
repository (or wherever) for testing.
Pushed, please test.
Thanks, works for me. The slight dissimilarity with the original files stems
from whitespace changes.
Probably because I have
whitespace = fix
Acked-by: Andreas Färber
I would suggest to rename unicode.c and blockiter.c,
too, though. Might bite
in the future.
True. I updated and pushed.