Re: [flashrom] [PATCH 2/2] Utilize new tested states for chipsets as well.

[Carl-Daniel Hailfinger]

Am 30.05.2014 05:15 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
> Mark all ME-enabled Intel chipsets as DEP, alter print.c accordingly
> (print_wiki.c was already prepared).
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[e-mail]>

Thanks for your patch!
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/

[PATCH 2/2] Utilize new tested states for chipsets as well.

[Stefan Tauner]

On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:16:25 +0200
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Am 30.05.2014 05:15 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
> > Mark all ME-enabled Intel chipsets as DEP, alter print.c accordingly
> > (print_wiki.c was already prepared).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[e-mail]>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>

Should we change the column widths of the chip enable table? It is
quite unaligned already and the third character of DEP does not make
that better.

-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

[PATCH 2/2] Utilize new tested states for chipsets as well.

[Stefan Tauner]

On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 04:10:08 +0200
Stefan Tauner <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:16:25 +0200
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Am 30.05.2014 05:15 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
> > > Mark all ME-enabled Intel chipsets as DEP, alter print.c accordingly
> > > (print_wiki.c was already prepared).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[e-mail]>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[e-mail]>
>
> Should we change the column widths of the chip enable table? It is
> quite unaligned already and the third character of DEP does not make
> that better.

As discussed on IRC. Committed in r1815. Thanks!

-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner