Am 09.03.2011 02:52 schrieb Michael Karcher:
As the comment indicates, that function is not a chip erase function at all, but a function calling a block eraser in a loop. So it adds no extra value to what we already have in the block_eraser infrastructure.
Furthermore, that function assumes a uniform sector size layout, but is referenced from flash chip with non-uniform sector size layout, which is just wrong.
Great, even more code killed. Thanks for your patch.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcherflashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Please compile test, then commit.
Regards, Carl-Daniel
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:30:33 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
Am 09.03.2011 02:52 schrieb Michael Karcher:
As the comment indicates, that function is not a chip erase function at all, but a function calling a block eraser in a loop. So it adds no extra value to what we already have in the block_eraser infrastructure.
Furthermore, that function assumes a uniform sector size layout, but is referenced from flash chip with non-uniform sector size layout, which is just wrong.
Great, even more code killed. Thanks for your patch.
Signed-off-by: Michael Karcherflashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net
Please compile test, then commit.
was committed in r1287
-
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger -
Stefan Tauner