On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:07:40 +0100 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net wrote:
+# This parameter picks the default setting for CONFIG_ variables of programmers not specified explicitly +# on the command line. +CONFIG_DEFAULT ?= yes
i dont like "picks" in there. whats wrong with configures, selects, sets? :)
also, i would rename CONFIG_DEFAULT because it is not specific enough. e.g. there is also CONFIG_PRINT_WIKI which is not (and should not be) affected by this setting. i propose CONFIG_PROGRAMMER_DEFAULT_STATE. yes, that is awfully long, but much clearer. a part of the problem is that we already have a CONFIG_DEFAULT_PROGRAMMER that we need to keep recognizably different.
# Disable Dediprog SF100 until support is complete and tested. CONFIG_DEDIPROG ?= no [etc]
whats the rationale to exclude those? IMHO it makes sense to enable them too with CONFIG_DEFAULT.