Here are the two files requested. The process failed, so I will try -c "S25FL128P......1" and send you another log (it takes quite long, so probably in an hour or so)Liviu
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Liviu Toma <email@example.com> wrote:
I apologize I didn't have a chance to try it. I am just trying it now, I will report a bit later
LiviuOn Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Stefan Tauner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2014 23:07:35 +0200Hi Liviu,
Stefan Tauner <email@example.com> wrote:
> S25FL128P is the predecessor family of S25FL128S. All these chips can
> not be distinguished without EDI.
> Additionally to the new S25FL128P chips, this patch also fixes the name of
> the previously supported S25FL128S model with uniform 256 kB sectors
> (S25FL128P......1 not 0) and adds the hybrid sector version as well.
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Since flashrom can not distinguish the chips itself, the user has to
> select the right chip with the -c parameter.
> Liviu, please apply this patch on top of r1806 and run flashrom once
> without any operation and without -c ....
> E.g. flashrom -p usbblaster_spi -o probe.log
> And a second time with the correct chip selected to write *different* data
> to the chip.
> E.g. flashrom -p usbblaster_spi -o write.log -w newdata.bin -c "S25FL128P......0"
> Please report back with the two log files.
are you gonna test this patch? If not I would like to commit it
untested so that it does not become outdated.
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner