On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
did you really test the 1.8V version too?

Nope. We can set that to UNTESTED if you prefer, though I don't think there's much reason to suspect it will fail when the 3V version works.

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

>                 .probe          = probe_spi_rdid,
>                 .probe_timing   = TIMING_ZERO,
> @@ -5450,9 +5454,44 @@
>                 .unlock         = spi_disable_blockprotect,
>                 .write          = spi_chip_write_256,
>                 .read           = spi_chip_read,
> +               .voltage        = {1700, 2000},
>         },
>
>         {
> +               .vendor         = "Numonyx",
> +               /* ..3E = 3V, uniform 64KB/4KB blocks/sectors */
> +               .name           = "N25Q064..3E",
> +               .bustype        = BUS_SPI,
> +               .manufacture_id = ST_ID,
> +               .model_id       = ST_N25Q064__3E,
> +               .total_size     = 8192,
> +               .page_size      = 256,
> +               /* supports SFDP */

Does it work as expected (testable by removing the chip definition)?

Obviously not or I wouldn't have bothered to make a patch for it :-)

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: 
There are a number of other N25Q* chips available apparently. Do you
plan to add them too (NB: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/3652/)?
Anyone else? Steven, our datasheet muncher maybe? :)

Would if I had more time...

-- 
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.