On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
<c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:
On 02.11.2010 04:01, David Hendricks wrote:
> I think this patch is important and should go in very soon. The code looks
> good to me, and I've successfully tested with it several times.
>
> Are there any outstanding issues or patches that should be submitted first?
>
Error recovery from a failed erase could be better, but it is pretty
much on par with the current code.
I have some cleanups and patches for better error recovery which
conflict with this patch, but they shouldn't hold this patch back. I
hope to resend them immediately after this patch is merged (and some of
them will be tiny afterwards).
To summarize, I think nothing else is left to do before committing this
patch.
Alrighty then! I've stared at the code as much as my eyes will allow and have tested it on a couple different platforms with SPI flash (AMD870 and Intel NM10), so:
Idwer's been doing a lot with this patch too, so you might want to wait for his ack as well.
--