Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 00:16 +0100 schrieb Michael Karcher:
Board enable backlog is going down rapidly! Thanks to Sean Nelson for the review/Ack.
Abit IP35 Pro: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/843/
- Board enable works, but we have one report that the BIOS backflashes
itself. No idea what happens.
No two BIOS chips on board. flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001837.html
Committed in r920
Abit VT6X4: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/955/ depending on http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/948/
Uwe wanted to take a look at 948
Still waiting for the review to the base patch (VIA GPIO generalization). Can submit a rebased patch if that helps. Sean's general Ack applies to the board enable patch.
HP Vectra VL420SFF: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/919/
Committed in r923
Intel SE440BX-2: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/842/
- Board enable does not work. GPO register on PIIX4 is for strange
reasons read-only, see http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-February/002272.html
flashrom/lspci/superiotool: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001988.html Ack: None, as the patch doesn't work. Plan: Unsure, because "broken" is not an option, only tested/not tested.
Plan: Postpone past 0.9.2, probably drop.
HP Vectra VL400: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/721/
Already committed.
Committed in r918
Asus M2NBP-VM CSM: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/717/
Committed in r924
MSI MS7207: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/659/
Plan: Commit in "not tested" state. Ack by some developer needed per signoff procedure.
Committed in r925
Regards, Michael Karcher