Attention is currently required from: Angel Pons.

View Change

1 comment:

• Commit Message:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 8:

    
    This was missed because `uint32_t` is `unsigned int` in most cases.
    However, it is not the case for DJGPP 6.1.0 for some reason.
    

    Got no response after several days, marking as resolved.

    You got no response for a couple of days because I have been recovering from surgery WTF.. That's why -2'ed to give a pause on this to give me a chance to discuss. I've not actually been at work but been trying to keep up to date so Anastasia and the community can keep moving.

    I cannot see how 'unsigned int' would be preferred over uint32_t, the correct type is clearly uint32_t for the intended case.

To view, visit change 52473. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.