Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk, Sergii Dmytruk.
View Change
2 comments:
File flash.h:
Patch Set #9, Line 203: flashrom_
I am thinking... do we really need "flashrom" prefix in this struct type name? […]
This is also exposed through libflashrom.h so I think we should keep the
"flashrom_" prefix.
Patch Set #9, Line 219:
/* Used for intrepreting configuration bits above */
const struct flashchip *chip;
Correction: I found implementation in CB:59183 and further in the chain (and added comments there). […]
Yeah this was kind of a hack, I've changed it now.
To view, visit change 58478. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I17dee630248ce7b51e624a6e46d7097d5d0de809
Gerrit-Change-Number: 58478
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:19:46 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment