Attention is currently required from: Thomas Heijligen, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons, Anastasia Klimchuk.

Patch set 4:Code-Review +1

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #4:

    I would prefer `unsigned int` instead, but have no strong feelings
    about it. I've myself used `size_t` as index type in the past just
    because it's more convenient to type :) but technically, it's
    reserved for byte indices.

    (The whole story is inconsistent because our definition of
    ARRAY_SIZE() implies size_t. Maybe that's something that should
    change?)

To view, visit change 55120. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.