Attention is currently required from: Aarya, Anastasia Klimchuk.

4 comments:

Commit Message:

Patch Set #5, Line 9:

Someone may prefer to sacrifice sub-blocks needless to change within a
larger erase block for programming speed. These people who are okay to
fry their chip sooner can set this option. If the percentage of
sub-blocks needless to change within a larger erase block is lower
than the given value, the whole larger erase block will be erased.

I wrote another version of commit message, what do you think? I can update myself, but first I want […]

Done

File cli_classic.c:

Patch Set #3, Line 124:

	       "      --sacrifice-ratio <ratio>     The percentage of overall sub-blocks needless to\n"
	       "                                    change within a larger erase block to be sacrificed\n"
	       "                                    for programming speed, default 0, max 100\n"

I have an idea, what do you think: […]

Done and added context for "S+1 size block".

File cli_classic.c:
- Patch Set #5, Line 126: max 100
  What do you think about restricting max to 50? I don't think values more than 50 make sense.
  Done
- Patch Set #5, Line 1141: Invalid input of sacrifice ratio, use default 0
  Invalid input of sacrifice ratio, valid range is 0-50. Fallback to default value 0. […]
  Done

To view, visit change 84721. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.