I'm having trouble to understand this change. What's the benefit
in having to specify "MX25L6405" to emulate an MX25L6436? Or is
anything broken atm?
After retesting the master I discovered that " ./flashrom -p dummy:emulate=MX25L6436 -c "MX25L6436E/MX25L6445E/MX25L6465E/MX25L6473E/MX25L6473F" " works OK. Sorry, I probably got confused by that flashchips.c doesn't have "MX25L6436" chip - has "MX25L6436E" instead, and when I initially tried " ./flashrom -p dummy:emulate=MX25L6436E " it didn't work --- so while trying to make things work I renamed "6436" to " 6405"... This change could be abandoned now, but maybe in the future we could rename MX25L6436 to MX25L6436E in those few places for clarity
To view, visit change 23837. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.