Attention is currently required from: Alexander Goncharov, Anastasia Klimchuk, Angel Pons, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger, Martin L Roth, Peter Marheine, Thomas Heijligen.
1 comment:
Patchset:
We already have the equivalent of a code of conduct. […]
I would like to suggest that the previous Friendliness etiquette has not worked very well in the past.
Particularly if I compare the coreboot project and the flashrom project, I have clear indication that there is value in adopting the coreboot Code of Conduct over the current "Friendliness" page. The developer base and community of both projects are fairly similar, with the coreboot project being significantly larger (and thus having more potential for conflict). I have gotten feedback that people generally prefer the coreboot Code of conduct implementation, and also the clarity of not trying to hide a Code of conduct behind the ambiguous term "Friendliness".
So, there is both a need and an update already available.
I would like to understand which parts of the coreboot code of conduct you oppose to with your -2, as there is a general expectation that -2 blocks give more actionable feedback than "I don't like change".
From the perspective of being legally responsible for running the infrastructure of this project, I also have a strong interest in unifying how the projects running on this infrastructure are generally managed.
That said, it is good to have you back, Carl-Daniel. Welcome to your first review in 3.5 years (and 5th review since flashrom switched to gerrit!) I am sure we will find a good solution that fits everybody's needs to some extent.
To view, visit change 76455. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.