Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons.

Simon Buhrow uploaded patch set #2 to this change.

View Change

flashchips.c: big erase blocksize first

Choosing the best fitting erase block size can safe
a significant amount of runtime. Changing the order
of entries of block_erasers in flashchips.c going
from the bigger block size to lower block size does
a better job.

I am running flashrom inside a VirtualBox so the
gained time is quite big.

Setup: IS25LP064 flash + ft2232H programmer
Saved time: > 2 min for single '-E' operation

Change-Id: I862ce0b5f8912565e43c340578d8126aa2e6aa3b
Signed-off-by: Simon Buhrow <simon.buhrow@posteo.de>
---
M flashchips.c
M flashrom.c
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/67/58467/2

To view, visit change 58467. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.