Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan, Sergii Dmytruk.
View Change
1 comment:
File flashrom.c:
Patch Set #13, Line 1931: restore_flash_wp(flash, initial_wp_cfg);
Indirectly calling `flashrom_wp_write_cfg` is intentional here? I guess it won't hurt, just looks w […]
Good point, I hadn't looked at this CL in a while and I thought we needed to restore in this case since the restore function won't be called if registration fails.
But this all happens before we disable flash protection in `unlock_flash_wp()` so we just need to free the reference to `initial_wp_cfg` like you said in your first comment.
To view, visit change 69517. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I74b3f5d3a17749ea60485b916b2d87467a5d8b2f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 69517
Gerrit-PatchSet: 14
Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:34:32 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment