Attention is currently required from: Angel Pons, Thomas Heijligen, WereCatf.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #2:

    Hello WereCatf, I am sorry that your patches got lost :( I mean this one and CB:58134. Are you still here? (I hope so).
    Would you be able to rebase the manually on the top? If you make this one and CB:58134 as a chain, that would be even better.

    What happened since last time you pushed the patches: all function pointers in chip definitions were replaced with enums. So if you rebase on the latest head, it won't compile, you need to use enums in chip definitions. Would you do that?

    I will also look later in the datasheets. Sorry again this was hanging for so long.

To view, visit change 58173. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.