Patch set 1:Code-Review +2
1 comment:
Patch Set #1, Line 299: void reverse_bytes(uint8_t *dst, const uint8_t *src, size_t length);
Memory is returning. I think my argument was that we're changing
the order of bits not bytes. Ofc, we can't name both functions
`reverse_bits`... my current choice would be:
uint8_t reverse_bits(uint8_t);
void reverse_bits_copy(uint8_t *, const uint8_t *, size_t);
But I won't fight it, if you want to keep the current names.
To view, visit change 28086. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.