Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Angel Pons.

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #5:

    I didn't take a look at the code, but I imagine this tries to use a full chip erase command where po […]

    The clou is the condition
    ```
    if ((block_size == flashctx->chip->total_size * 1024) && per_blockfn == &erase_block){
    ```
    So when the block size equals the flash size it uses the biggest possible erase block size (assuming the eraseblocks are always given in ascending order).

    I have never worked with a layout that´s why I didn´t test it. However in case of a given layout the "normal" way should be taken.

To view, visit change 58467. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.