Attention is currently required from: Anastasia Klimchuk, Nikolai Artemiev, Stefan Reinauer.
9 comments:
Commit Message:
Patch Set #1, Line 7: MX2525643G
Let's use exact name MX25U25643G , can you please update?
Done
Patch Set #1, Line 8: MX2525635F
Same here, probably MX25U25635F
Done
Patch Set #1, Line 10: Tested: read, write and erase.
Could you please add info which programmer you ran?
Done
Datasheet is available at the following URL:
https://www.mxic.com.tw/Lists/Datasheet/Attachments/8766/MX2525643G,%201.8V.%20256Mb,%20v1.1.pdf
You need to update the link (the new one you gave me in the comment works)
Done
File flashchips.c:
Patch Set #1, Line 10094: MACRONIX_MX25U25643G
After you fix my other comment about id, you will change this to MACRONIX_MX25U25635F
Done
{
.eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 8192} },
.block_erase = SPI_BLOCK_ERASE_21,
},
Maybe I am missing something, I don't see this in the datasheet. […]
I compared the two chips MX25U25635F and MX25U25635F, and the two chips used almost the same command set. In 4 Byte Address Command Set, 21h for sector erase.
{
.eraseblocks = { {32 * 1024, 1024} },
.block_erase = SPI_BLOCK_ERASE_52,
},
same
Done
.eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 512} },
.block_erase = SPI_BLOCK_ERASE_DC,
}, {
same
Done
File include/flashchips.h:
Patch Set #1, Line 530: #define MACRONIX_MX25U25643G 0x2539
Don't add the same id, add a comment on existing id (MACRONIX_MX25U25635F), like that: […]
Done
To view, visit change 76853. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.