Attention is currently required from: Patrick Rudolph.

Patch set 2:Code-Review -1

1 comment:

Patchset:
- Patch Set #2:
  Sorry, I could not figure out from the history why there is
  a wildcard `.` in the name. It seems the original patch was
  tested with a JW. But there was a thread on the mailing list
```
    "Do you have support for W25Q128FW and W25Q256.W?"
```
  where a Winbond employee suggested that an FW once existed.
  It seems possible that it did not support the full command
  set, just like the FV version (if that is true at all and
  not an error in the datasheet).
  Without further details, we'd have to split the flashchips
  entry into FW and JW. Otherwise, we'd risk a regression for
  the former. Only getting hands on a 256FW sample could clear
  this up :-/

To view, visit change 44810. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.