Needs many fixes and retesting I guess.

View Change

9 comments:

• File flashchips.h:

  • Patch Set #2, Line 609: 62

    The chip doesn't support the three byte RDID, 0x62 is just the
    repetition of the vendor id.

  • Patch Set #2, Line 610: #define SANYO_LE25FU206 0x4462

    same here, I guess

• File flashchips.c:

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11628: .probe = probe_spi_rdid,

    datasheet suggests res2

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11632: .eraseblocks = { {2 * 1024, 64} },

    The datasheet I'm reading suggests 4KiB sectors... wrote a mail.

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11649: {

    missing tab

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11656: .page_size = 256,

    datasheet suggests WRSR_WREN

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11658: .probe = probe_spi_rdid,

    same here

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11673:

    		.printlock	= spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp2_srwd,
    		.unlock		= spi_disable_blockprotect, /* #WP pin write-protects SRWP bit. */
    

    Datasheet suggests the same register layout as for 106B?

  • Patch Set #2, Line 11685: .model_id = SANYO_LE25FU206A,

    Judging from the similarity to the 25FU406C id (0x0612 / 0x0613),
    We might also want to test the additional erase opcodes known for
    the 406C.

To view, visit change 28813. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.