Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev, Sergii Dmytruk.

Patch set 7:Code-Review +2

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #7:

    Moving here the comment from patch owner:

    However, CB:68221 is probably better be abandoned. Without a reliable way of chip identification (e.g., by hashing SFDP) there can be no precise diagnostics on the status of WP for a chip as one chip record can cover unknown number of chips (including those that don't yet exist).

    Do we all need to have another look?

To view, visit change 68221. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.