Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev.

Patch set 1:Code-Review -1

View Change

1 comment:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #1:

    Further explanation of the reasons for this change: […]

    Sorry, I'm not convinced. This looks like a workaround for something only downstream uses.

    However, I agree that having to deal with multiple flash chip definitions is annoying. If what downstream needs is to ignore one of the flashchip definitions, why not add a command-line argument to specify flashchip entries to ignore? It would have the same semantics as `-C`. This feature would be useful for everyone, not just downstream.

To view, visit change 52883. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.