Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Nikolai Artemiev.

View Change

1 comment:

• Commit Message:

  • Patch Set #4, Line 10: preventing confusion

    We would still print the former in the NT case, right?

    Yes.

    I've added the change to handle `NA` value properly because reporting "unimplemented" for `NA` state looks inappropriate. I guess I meant preventing potential confusion as this doesn't improve current situation, just makes better messages possible. However, now that I think about multiple chip models being mapped onto the same entry and that this will only get worse with time, maybe messages shouldn't be precise or they will not be reliable.

To view, visit change 68221. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.