Attention is currently required from: Felix Singer, Nico Huber, Thomas Heijligen.
View Change
1 comment:
Patchset:
Patch Set #5:
> > nobody cares how the local code looks like. […]
IMHO I believe flashrom doesn't benefit from vendor/device ID macros in most cases, as we have a string associated with VID/PID pairs, e.g. chipset_enable.c `chipset_enables` array. We rarely need to reference device IDs more than once.
The only place where I see a bit of redundancy is in nicintel code: flashrom has two separate programmers for SPI and EEPROM, and there are NICs with both. So some IDs appear in two files. I don't see a good way to unify this that can be considered an improvement.
To view, visit change 66864. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Id48407be4ceae7a3953179050e0a991f6d8335f0
Gerrit-Change-Number: 66864
Gerrit-PatchSet: 6
Gerrit-Owner: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat@joursoir.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 10:03:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment