Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Edward O'Callaghan, Angel Pons.
View Change
3 comments:
Patchset:
File tests/io_mock.h:
Patch Set #1, Line 37: NOT
Would you agree on NON_ZERO (with underscore)? I think it's a bit more readable.
I renamed macro to NON_ZERO
Patch Set #1, Line 38: NOT_NULL ((void *)NOT_ZERO)
Is it ok for this stub function to be in this header? […]
I created not_null() function, but left NON_ZERO as macro, is this what you meant, or you meant them both to be functions (non_zero and not_null)?
Also I added io_mock.c, is this correct approach?
Thank you!
To view, visit change 57269. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5ad6ee4aa9091447c6c9108c92bf7f6e755fca48
Gerrit-Change-Number: 57269
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 03:37:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment