Anastasia Klimchuk submitted this change.

View Change

doc: Fix the example Signed-off-by line to be displayed properly

It was not displayed, so needed to be fixed. Secondly, it is just
one line and can be an inline code markup instead of a code-block
(the latter was not displayed for some reasons).

Change-Id: I0f26d6fb03d1491daefa4a362068f674230e94a6
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@flashrom.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/76663
Reviewed-by: Peter Marheine <pmarheine@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
---
M doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
index b4887ef..950fa91 100644
--- a/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
+++ b/doc/dev_guide/development_guide.rst
@@ -87,9 +87,7 @@
 <http://web.archive.org/web/20070306195036/http://osdlab.org/newsroom/press_releases/2004/2004_05_24_dco.html>`_
 do. Add a note such as
 
-.. code-block::
-
-    Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
+:code:`Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>`
 
 to your email/patch if you agree with the Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
 printed below. Read `this post on the LKML

To view, visit change 76663. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.