Attention is currently required from: Simon Buhrow, Aarya, Anastasia Klimchuk.

View Change

8 comments:

• Patchset:

  • Patch Set #86:

    relatively minor stuff now, we can still iterate in tree however the more const correctness the better. The more expensive you can be with types the better it communicates your intentions of your code to the compiler - e.g., modifying a loop upper bound you intended to be const.

• File erasure_layout.c:

  • Patch Set #86, Line 114: s

    `const`

  • Patch Set #86, Line 130: size_t num;

    delete

  • Patch Set #86, Line 133: (

    `size_t num = 0;`

  • Patch Set #86, Line 165: const unsigned int

    `const size_t`?

  • Patch Set #86, Line 166: unsigned int

    and this `size_t` too?

  • Patch Set #86, Line 216: int

    `const int` ?

  • Patch Set #86, Line 217: int

    `const int` ?

To view, visit change 65844. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.